Real-Time Emissions Monitoring: Operational Insights from the Field


A recent deployment of Qube Technologies' continuous emissions monitoring system at a QB Energy well pad in the Piceance Basin has yielded tangible operational benefits beyond regulatory compliance.

Case Overview

In June 2024, QB Energy strategically implemented a network of five methane sensors for real-time emissions quantification. By January 2025, this system proved its value when it detected a sustained methane increase exceeding state inventory baselines at the site.

What makes this case particularly relevant for operational teams is that the monitoring system identified an unexpected source. Rather than a common thief hatch issue, field personnel discovered a reportable produced water spill caused by a failed manifold—a problem that might have gone undetected longer during routine inspections alone.

Key Operational Outcomes

The case demonstrates several practical advantages of continuous monitoring:

  1. Early Problem Detection: The system identified the issue through persistent methane readings before visual inspection would have caught it

  2. Precise Problem Location: Qube's dashboard pinpointed the emissions source to the produced water tank area

  3. Contained Environmental Impact: Thanks to early detection, the spill remained within existing berms

  4. Regulatory Compliance: The operator promptly reported the incident to CDPHE as required

  5. Verified Resolution: Post-repair data confirmed a 96% reduction in emissions to baseline levels

Technical Performance

For engineers and operations managers, the system's sensitivity is particularly noteworthy. It detected even minimal methane emissions from the produced water spill, demonstrating both the site's low baseline emissions and the monitoring technology's precision.

The verification capabilities also provide valuable operational data—the system confirmed that repairs were effective by measuring the return to baseline emission levels after the manifold was fixed.

Business Implications

For decision-makers evaluating emissions monitoring technologies, this case illustrates how continuous monitoring shifts from a regulatory requirement to an operational asset:

  • Faster Issue Resolution: Problems identified and addressed before escalation

  • Resource Optimization: Field personnel directed precisely where needed

  • Documented Compliance: Automated emissions tracking throughout the incident lifecycle

  • Risk Mitigation: Environmental containment verified before ground contamination occurred

More Information

This straightforward application of continuous monitoring technology delivers actionable operational intelligence while enhancing environmental protection efforts.

Download the Complete Case Study for detailed specifications of the implemented system, the complete timeline from detection to resolution, and the quantitative emissions data that guided the response.

Previous
Previous

Qube Receives NGIF Accelerator Grant Funding to Advance Emissions Monitoring

Next
Next

EPA Deregulation and Methane Monitoring: What Operators Need to Know